Why in News?
- The Supreme Court has clarified that its direction requiring prior approval for mining within a 10-km radius of the Asan Wetland Conservation Reserve would apply to wetland conservation reserves across the country.
Prelims Pointers
- Ramsar Sites are wetlands designated under the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands (1971).
- India became a Contracting Party to the Ramsar Convention in 1982.
- India has 101 Ramsar Sites (2026), the highest in Asia.
- A Ramsar designation does not create a separate statutory protection regime under Indian law.
- Neither the Ramsar Convention nor the Wetlands (Conservation and Management) Rules, 2017 prescribe a statutory buffer zone around Ramsar Sites.
- There is no statutory prohibition on mining within a specified distance of a Ramsar Site under the 2017 Rules.
- The Wetlands (Conservation and Management) Rules, 2010 contained an explicit list of prohibited activities and required prior approval for activities within a wetland’s zone of influence.
- The 2017 Rules replaced the 2010 framework with a decentralised system under State Wetland Authorities.
- The Supreme Court (Asan Wetland case, 2024) directed that mining within 10 km of a Wetland Conservation Reserve requires prior approval of the Standing Committee of the National Board for Wildlife (NBWL) and/or the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC).
- This 10-km requirement is a judicial safeguard and not a statutory buffer prescribed under the Ramsar Convention or the Wetlands Rules.
UPSC Prelims Practice Question (English)
Q. With reference to Ramsar Sites and mining in India, consider the following statements:
- The Ramsar Convention prescribes a statutory 10-km buffer zone around all Ramsar Sites.
- The Wetlands (Conservation and Management) Rules, 2017 expressly prohibit mining within a specified distance of Ramsar Sites.
- The Supreme Court’s direction requiring prior approval for mining within 10 km of the Asan Wetland Conservation Reserve is a judicial safeguard and not a statutory provision.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
A. 1 only
B. 2 and 3 only
C. 3 only
D. 1, 2 and 3
Answer: C
Explanation
- Statement 1: Incorrect. The Ramsar Convention does not prescribe a statutory buffer zone.
- Statement 2: Incorrect. The Wetlands (Conservation and Management) Rules, 2017 do not expressly prohibit mining within a specified distance of Ramsar Sites.
Statement 3: Correct. The 10-km requirement flows from the Supreme Court’s directions in the Asan Wetland case, not from the Ramsar Convention or the 2017 Rules.



